Act Four
Luke 16:19-31
(Gary W. Charles, Cove
Presbyterian Church, Covesville, VA
9-25-2016)
In
2004, when I was called as pastor of the Central Presbyterian Church in
Atlanta, I entered a world new to me. Not the world inside the church building so much as the world camped on the
steps, in the alley, and on the sidewalks outside
the building.
Day
and especially at night women and men, and occasionally children, would roll up their clothes for a pillow,
carve out cardboard for a makeshift bed and shelter, and camp out on cold
concrete in the winter and scorching concrete in the summer. Every night when I
left Central, I tried not to dwell on the nameless folks without a home who
were camping on the church grounds, since I was about to return to a comfortable
home, a soft bed, with a refrigerator full of food.
Memories of the early years at Central, trying
not to notice folks living outside the church, came rushing back this week when
I read the parable Jesus tells in Luke’s Gospel. It is a parable that people
often think is easy to pin down. I would suggest otherwise.
Some
pin down this story as an anti-wealth parable. This theme is common in Luke’s
Gospel. Mary sings in her Magnificat: “He has brought down the powerful from
their thrones, and lifted up the lowly” (1:52). In an early sermon in Luke, Jesus
says that God’s Reign is for the hungry and poor, and woe to those who are
rich. So some conclude the parable is about the problem of having too much
wealth. Maybe, but I doubt it.
Some
pin down this story as the “Jesus loves the poor” parable. In this parable,
poverty’s new name is Lazarus, from Eleazar, which means, “God helps.” In an old
English carol based on this parable, when the rich man sends his dogs to chase
the poor beggar Lazarus from his gate, a miracle occurs when the dogs do not
attack poor Lazarus but instead lick his sores. So some conclude the parable is
about God’s preferential treatment of the poor. Maybe, but I think the parable
goes much deeper.
The poet Edith Sitwell pins down the parable in yet another
way. In her poem, Still Falls the Rain, she
presents Lazarus and the rich man not as opposites but as fellow sufferers,
each in need of the mercy of God. She writes, “Christ . . . have mercy on
us--/On Dives and on Lararus: /Under the
rain the sore and the gold are as one.” Maybe this is what the parable is
about, that whether rich or poor, we all stand in desperate need of the mercy
of God. While this fact is true, I believe the parable wants us to go much
deeper still.
So, let me suggest another way to read this
parable. Jesus tells this story in three acts. In Act One we meet the
characters: a rich man whose wealth is defended
by a gate and demonstrated by royal garments and lavish meals and a poor
beggar, Lazarus, who waits each day for the trash to be carried out from the
rich man’s mansion. In Act One, we see the world as many then and today see it,
a world designed by God, where blessings in this life are a sign of God’s favor,
while poverty and hunger are signs of human sloth and Divine displeasure.
Act
Two shifts from this life to the afterlife. The poor beggar is treated like the
prophet Elijah as he is carried on a chariot to the halls of heaven, while the
rich man is buried and tortured endlessly by heat and thirst in Hell. In Act
Two, the world as we know it is turned upside down, a world in which the poor
prosper and the rich suffer. Yet, in a very basic way, Act Two is simply a repeat
of Act One in a new location. The rich man’s interest in Lazarus is simply in
how best the beggar can serve him.
Act
Three begins with the rich man pleading with Father Abraham to send Lazarus to
visit his five brothers, like Jacob Marley is sent to warn Scrooge of his
impending fate. The rich man wants Lazarus to tell them of the torture that
awaits them, unless they repent. Clarence Jordan, a good Georgia biblical wise
man, who retold the parables in a Southern idiom, interprets Abraham’s answer
to the rich man: “Lazarus ain’t gonna
run no mo’ yo’ errands, rich man.”
I want to suggest that this parable is not yet
finished, but awaits Act Four. I want to suggest that this parable is not
finally about the rich and the poor or about who gets a heads up that storms
are coming. I want to suggest that this parable is less about the afterlife,
about eternal feasting for the poor in heaven or scorching in Hell for the
rich. I want to suggest that this parable is unfinished and its true meaning is
revealed as you and I live out Act Four.
Read
the parable closely and the sin of the rich man is not that he is rich or even
that he can be mean, sending his dogs to torment the beggar. The great sin of
the rich man is not noticing. The rich man never notices Lazarus. He is just
another one of the countless homeless, the annoying beggars who are best
ignored. Even after his death, even sweating like a devilish dog, the rich man
never notices Lazarus as anything more than a slave to serve his needs or an
errand boy to carry his message.
The
great sin in this parable, the real chasm in this parable is not seeing, not
noticing. Until you and I can see, can notice, those who are most often
stereotyped or simply ignored, then we are the poor ones no matter how much
money we have in the bank.
I
would like to think that in Act Four the brothers of the rich man notice what
he never did, notice the kinfolk of Lazarus covered with cardboard, sleeping on
city streets, without enough food, and with nowhere to call home. I would like to
think that they start to lose sleep at night not over how to invest their latest
dividends or where to go on their next vacation, but that there are so many
nameless ones are eating their daily trash and sleeping under interstate
overpasses at night.
As I
read this parable, it is not that the rich man did something wrong during his
life on earth; the problem is that he did no-thing,
nothing. I would like to think that Act Four is not finally about what the
brothers of the rich man notice, but what you and I notice. Do we notice the
millions in our land of plenty who die from hunger and malnutrition every year?
Do we notice people of color who fear for their lives because they are not
known by name but by category? Do we notice all who die because of limited
health care and almost no mental health care in our land or those who die from chemicals
we dump into rivers and belch into the air or who die because they are sent
back to their deaths as refugees and immigrants, legal and illegal? I would
like to think that the first step toward doing some-thing is for you and I to notice.
After
being tutored by wise, compassionate mentors in Atlanta, I started to notice,
never enough, but I noticed. The folks sleeping in our Shelter and camped
outside the building were no longer “the homeless” to me; they were Lucas and
Larry, Mike and Teresa. They were children of God, loved by God as much as I am
or you are. They had stories to tell that started to close the great chasm of
not noticing and they would no longer let me excuse living on streets as an
unfortunate reality. In time, they taught me to notice. As a result, they made
my life richer than it had ever been before.
A big part of me wishes that this parable were
easy to pin down, that it were only a simple story about the rich and the poor
and life yet to come, and not about how you and I are to live this life right
now. A better part of me knows that this parable is all about seeing, about
noticing, and when we do, Act Four begins and so does new life this side of the
grave, a life worth living every single minute.
AMEN